Jump to content
Forums

Sab

Daeva
  • Content Count

    57
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. I keep hearing conflicting stories and can't quite find an official source. Does anyone know what our rank requirements will be for Dark Poeta? I know the original is ~19, however I'm also hearing some say there was a change down to roughly ~15k for S-rank. Do we have an official answer on this? Thanks!
  2. For what it is worth, it seems nearly every single person punished ended up quitting anyways. Most of them even charged back all their purchases which results in a perma ban regardless. at least on Israphel I can’t think of a single person who has played since getting their gear stripped.
  3. I give you alternative viewpoints on multiple topics and your replies are childish at best. I guess I’m done trying to converse with you.
  4. It’s not dead when this topic is fueling the disdain and doubt in regards to the legitimacy of the AP Trading punishments being handed out.
  5. Can we truly say there have been any wrongful bans? People lie. People also break rules they may not have known existed.
  6. Have you read my recent edit? You’re arguing re-entires. I’m arguing the looting exploit. When I touched the link on my phone it was resetting me to the beginning of the thread, and the paragraph I’ve cited 2-3 times now. I’m not trying to “believe” anything. You’re just really bad at continual discourse apparently. Kibblez said two things: 1) Obtaining higher amounts of an item by abusing a loot mechanic is unacceptable. (This is what I’m emphasizing as a possible reason for the bans.) 2) Entering the same instance multiple times is not the issue. (This is where you’re m
  7. Did you? “there are no issues we have been able to identify with the execution of this ban wave.” The bans were deliberate. Not automated. Not accidental. “While we can empathize with anyone who many have engaged in this behavior unwittingly at the direction of others, knowingly re-entering a quest instance dozens of times of times to obtain much higher amounts of rewards than intended is neither sustainable, nor acceptable.” Neither Sustainable nor acceptable I’m not trying to be argumentative, what am I missing here? (I use the forums on my phone so I
  8. My intent behind this post was to explain tl people that the SR bans were justifiable, even if they didn’t participate in the primary Exploit investigated, and I felt it was important to shed some light on because people were using the innocently banned in SR Argument to cast doubt on the legitimacy of the AP trading punishments. I do not support nor condone the use or abuse of any bug/exploit. Rome wasn’t built in a day; enjoy the game at its natural pace.
  9. I’m confused. Are you now agreeing that it is in fact bannable? I thought you said people weren’t getting banned for multiple turn ins? It’s very clearly considered an offense. Clarification needed.
  10. Well said. They can’t expect everyone to read every single word of the TOS and Code of Conduct and successfully interpret everything exactly as intended. I’m just here to broaden the spotlight and explain to people that exploits are Bannable, no matter how silly or small. We rely on the staff to use their judgment as far as which exploits are worth enforcing punishments on. Valid concept. Most people I know only did 2-3 turn ins per run. If they stand by their assessment of 10+ Entries; that’s peculiar for sure.
  11. You sure about that? This is from Kibblez, it was also explained in responses to support tickets. “Just to close out this topic with everyone - there are no issues we have been able to identify with the execution of this ban wave. While we can empathize with anyone who many have engaged in this behavior unwittingly at the direction of others, knowingly re-entering a quest instance repeatedly (often dozens of times) to obtain much higher amounts of rewards than intended is neither sustainable, nor acceptable. We would encourage all users to review our User Agreement here for f
  12. Candies to skip crafting animations is comparable to weaving skills to cancel auto attack animations. There is a priority of operations and I think that one just conveniently lines up. Being able to craft while in a form that doesn’t allow animations could possibly be considered an exploit (I’m not an expert). Why is everyone coming at me sideways as if I support any or all other exploits? Lol. For what it’s worth, I don’t craft with candies, and I don’t use third party programs that interfere with game files, or that give me any sort of advantage. I do run a DPS
  13. I agree that it’s a bannable offense, however I’m not in charge of anything and have no control over which areas they feel like enforcing. Ask anyone who knows me, I don’t support any exploits or shortcuts. It’s against the rules by definition, doesn’t mean they are enforcing it over something minor I suppose. I’m not convinced people were wrongfully punished. It’s more likely that people lie. By definition that is utilizing a mechanic in a way it wasn’t intended. I’m not saying it should be punishable, but I won’t be naive and pretend it’s not an exploit.
  14. I felt it necessary to explain to some people who didn’t seem to understand what took place in SR, and that their misunderstandings have led them to believe Staff are incompetent when handing out bans and punishments. People are using the logic “I know several innocent people who were banned during the SR Exploit Ban Wave who never participated in the kinah chest hack.” I always interject - “yes, but were they abusing the looting mechanics of hats or wines to enable them to carry more than the allotted amount?”. Straight from the TOS, and Aion Rules of Conduct (which you all agr
  15. I interpreted what you said as though ‘my’ comment is proof of nothing, as if he wasn’t punished for allegedly AP trading. If the investigation was thorough enough to determine which gear was legitimately purchased that’s good enough for me. The combine seems like an oversight. I don’t think they know how to best handle it.
×
×
  • Create New...