Jump to content


  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won


Posts posted by HealingSquid-KT

  1. 17 hours ago, Rag-DN said:

    P.S.  Almost every player is waiting for some sort of Tie-in promotion that rewards retail players that are also playing Classic or some sort of promo that promotes new Classic Players to try Retail. Please slap your marketing department and breath some more life into Aion. Thanks!

    No way, I want classic and retail far apart from each other forever. No one i know that is playing classic will ever go back to play retail ever because retail is a joke.

  2. 9 hours ago, Easycrow said:

    Does the ingame report autohunting/bot function work at all? I have used this numerous times on very obvious bots and yet they are still there farming the same locations a week later. I'm also seeing gladiator bots attacking mobs from insane distances, teleporting etc. And no, it's not lag. Surely this kind of stuff is easily detected.

    If people don't see results then your words start to lose value.

    It does but as kibblez has mentioned many people can not see the difference between multiboxers and botters. It is obvious to NCsoft that these multiboxers have not slept 1ce since the servers went live a month ago and that is normal behaviour for humans according to NCsoft.

  3. 5 hours ago, Grace said:

    so theres a issue i dont like about the game we do lower forts and upper forts sometimes and no asmos show up to a fort defense and we cant get a dredgion to pop it should pop all the time when asmos dont show up to  a fort defense its not fair for us to waste a hour of our time just to get nothing out of the rewards.

    You kill the towers they give you contribution if no one shows up. No one is obligated to show up and get dominated tho.

  4. 1 hour ago, Arazith-IS said:

    All that "0" influence tells you is that Elyos were unable to cap a fort, nothing else. It doesn't say how many are online, were even in the Abyss, or just crafting in Sanctum or PVEing. Forthyn's chart (which anyone can verify if they want to collect that data at the same time), paints more of the picture of what could be happening. If you want to refute the numbers, by all means start presenting your own to actually back up your claims. 

    Yea exactly, What forth does is good it shows numbers are far closer than you think it is just a bit of the elyos playstyles.

    Example: I would say 60-70% of the clerics i have met are DPS clerics, Worried about contribution before actually capping a fort. You can sit down next to the healers and pot/heal up w/o getting a heal. 

    There is far more than this going on as well. As an example: I counted those who were afk one siege in reshanta/doing the lower fort repeats(because asmos are pre-occupied) and we had 118 elyos in reshanta not participating in siege many of which were 40+. They would rather fight and try and KS each other over mobs on a bridge(legitimately 3 groups on the same bridge). Than turn up for siege. 

    Ultimately Asmo's like PvP more than elyos that is abundantly clear with how many times they come back over and over and over while elyos quit after a single group member dying to an asmo.

  5. 33 minutes ago, Pancheto said:

    The candies here go back to Ncsoft's revenue. Meanwhile this exploit affects all the users in the game and NCsoft.

    Yes but they are not using that revenue to ban hackers/bots which is against ToS. Why should players care if they do not uphold their own ToS?

  6. 21 minutes ago, Fappachino said:

    I'll do it w/o the quotes and say that yesterday's siege was a FREE FORT for Elyos.

    Why do elyos even need forts? They are getting 10s of 1000s of medals from IS when it gets merged in to the server. Beyond that the instances will have portals for the losing faction so they can still do the instances. Other than morphs there is no reason to contest forts at all.

    Elyos are better off getting a PvP buff since their entire faction seems to be solo orientated gamers. 

  7. 35 minutes ago, Loadrng said:

    I'd like clarification on what you consider a "free fort", because there was a shiton of asmos pvping us. Sure IT WAS NOT the entire force, but we have less people at lvl 50, and due to that, less geared (pve, pvp, you name it). We had to have half of our force pvp and half on deity to try and hold the asmos, and even then we couldn't.

    So no, it was not free. lol

    Pretty sure that is why forth used the quotation marks.

  8. 3 hours ago, Forthyn - Asmodaes Pea-k said:

    Faction razzing aside, I assume the Elyos did not show up to Miren because they think they "couldn't do that yet." 

    Players should always try for content, even if it is beyond their level — you don't know if you'll fail until you fail, and if you succeed it is the best-tasting satisfaction, made even better by being around the people who were with you when you achieved success.

    Nah they did not show up because of the agreement with specific people on the asmo side. In which was a trust issue the elyos should of never put in the other faction.

  9. 11 hours ago, Forthyn - Asmodaes Pea-k said:

    Miren was a free fort — only two alliances came and Elyos didn't post about it in LFG until 10min before siege.

    Why were the elyos not showing up tho? This is a very important piece of information. Due to being to trusting that is why.

    Now many elyos would rather the PvP buff over showing up to siege so it is going to be the same way in SL soon enough.

  • Create New...