Jump to content


  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won


Recent Profile Visitors

3,614 profile views
  1. You kill the towers they give you contribution if no one shows up. No one is obligated to show up and get dominated tho.
  2. I hope this is not passive aggressive sarcasm because what he does is good. I just read it like you were trying that passive aggressive approach.
  3. Yea exactly, What forth does is good it shows numbers are far closer than you think it is just a bit of the elyos playstyles. Example: I would say 60-70% of the clerics i have met are DPS clerics, Worried about contribution before actually capping a fort. You can sit down next to the healers and pot/heal up w/o getting a heal. There is far more than this going on as well. As an example: I counted those who were afk one siege in reshanta/doing the lower fort repeats(because asmos are pre-occupied) and we had 118 elyos in reshanta not participating in siege many of which were 40+. The
  4. Yes but they are not using that revenue to ban hackers/bots which is against ToS. Why should players care if they do not uphold their own ToS?
  5. Eh, Candies already injected more kinah in to the game.
  6. Merge or paid transfers, Either way people will be bringing medals over to sell for kinah so they can RMT them off.
  7. Why do elyos even need forts? They are getting 10s of 1000s of medals from IS when it gets merged in to the server. Beyond that the instances will have portals for the losing faction so they can still do the instances. Other than morphs there is no reason to contest forts at all. Elyos are better off getting a PvP buff since their entire faction seems to be solo orientated gamers.
  8. So long as SL players do not lose their names to Isra server players merge away
  9. Why would they do that when people are willing to pay for 30 day pets.
  • Create New...